Saturday, July 2, 2011

Sex, Drugs, and Binaural Beats


Many of us might have heard of the so-called "digital drugs" or i-Dosing that have been distributed all over the web for the last few years. They are based on binaural beats patterns and have been sought by young people around the world for mere curiosity's sake or even as a substitution for actual drugs whenever it's difficult to get those.

Websites distributing these claim to have parallel "digital drugs" for each actual one. That means you can find a soundtrack that supposedly causes you to feel like you've smoked marijuana or sniffed cocaine. Also many of them claim to enhance sexual experiences and simulate sexual pleasure. Some of them label the soundtracks, which can range from weak to "VERY VERY STRONG".

Scientific studies have found out that the said "digital drugs" have no provable effects. They say the sensations one feels can be psychological, and that there's no evidence that they can cause addiction. In fact binaural beats have been a controversial issue in itself when it comes to stimulating the human brain. Many a scientist have failed to prove their actual influence on our minds.

I particularly think that, from a religious perspective, if it does stimulate the senses it can cause addiction. Most of these mp3 tracks are connected with utterly satanic images or names, which makes me believe the effects could be more of a religious issue than a physical one. People listening to this are willingly allowing the devil to manipulate their minds and senses, which explains the ecstatic manifestation we can see in YouTube videos.

In some cases it might not be the binaural device itself causing or generating brain related activities, but rather the minimalistic character of the sound track, which can induce trance or trance-like responses.

Satan has a deeper understanding of musical phenomena than most of us might suppose. No wonder he knows accurately how and to which extent musical acoustics does influence our brain. Let's not set our foot in this dangerous threshold. No matter how harmless science has been telling us it is.

0 comments: